This website is dedicated L’ilui Nishmas R’ Shmuel Yitzchak ben R’ Moshe A”H ר’ שמואל יצחק בן ר’ משה ע”ה

1245 – Brachos and Tefillos – (Klal 65 Siman 3) – Brachos and Tefillos Pratiyos – 3 – Baruch Shepitrani; With or Without Sheim and Malchus

D'var Halacha
D'var Halacha
1245 - Brachos and Tefillos - (Klal 65 Siman 3) - Brachos and Tefillos Pratiyos - 3 - Baruch Shepitrani; With or Without Sheim and Malchus
/

 We are beginning siman 3. The Chayei Adam writes that when a person’s son turns bar mitzvah, the first time the child receives an aliyah, the father recites the bracha ברוך אתה ה אלוקינו מלך העולם אשר פטרני מעונשו של זה. The Rema, in siman 225:2, writes that some people recite שפטרני instead of אשר פטרני. Additionally, he writes that it is better to recite the bracha without Hashem’s name, just reciting ברוך שפטרני מעונשו של זה.

The Chayei Adam disagrees with the Rema. The Chayei Adam writes that the Maharil, one of the Gedolei Ashkenazi who lived a few generations before the Rema, would make this bracha with Hashem’s name. 

The Rema, in Darkei Moshe, asks on the Maharil that this bracha is not found in the Gemara, and, if so, has no precedent. 

Thus, the question centers around whether brachos which are not found in the Gemara can be instituted by Geonim and Rishonim. The Rema holds that a bracha not found in the Gemara cannot be instituted by later authorities, and may be a bracha levatala. 

However, the Rema does admit that the bracha is mentioned in the Midrash. The question then becomes whether the Midrash can be relied upon as a definitive halachic source, whether the Midrash mentions this bracha literally or figuratively, and whether the Gemara’s silence indicates its disagreement. The Rema clearly holds that the Midrash cannot be relied upon, but the Maharil, among others, holds it can be relied upon.

 The Chayei Adam writes that the Maharshal seems to find a middle ground. A bracha which has no source at all cannot be instituted by the Geonim. But if a bracha has some sort of source in Chazal, the Geonim can come along later and establish it as a bona fide bracha.

There are other brachos to which this discussion applies as well. The brachos of hanosein la’yeif koach, she’asani kirtzono and mekadeish es shimcha barabim are not found in the Gemara, but instituted by the Geonim. On the other hand, someich noflim and magbiah shefalim are examples of two brachos which we do not say, because they have no earlier source whatsoever. 

 We will discuss this further in upcoming shiurim. 

Summary

  • There is a machlokes whether brachos which are not found in the Gemara can later be established as bona fide brachos or not. Practically, if the bracha has a secondary source (e.g., Midrash), we will recite it, but if it does not, we do not recite it.
    • Thus, for example, the Chayei Adam writes that Baruch Shepitrani may be recited with Hashem’s name.

You Might Also Like

Sign Up to Receive Our Free Daily Email That Includes:


Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content