We have finished Klal 59, but we need to clarify one point. In shiur 1141, we learned that, m’ikar hadin (according to the letter of the law) a shinui makom can be effected even when one moves m’cheder l’cheder, between rooms of a house. However, we also learned that the Mishnah Berurah brought an opinion […]
Klal 59 Siman 16
We are continuing in Klal 59. We will discuss situations where it is muttar lechatchilla to effect a shinui makom during an eating session. In Klal 47, the Chayei Adam writes that one is not allowed to leave their makom without birchas hamazon, and one must return to where he ate to say birchas hamazon.
1156 Klal 59 Siman 16: Shinui Makom 20 – Bracha Achrona B’Mekomo 4; Opinion of the Poskim for the Sefardim
We need to clarify a few points in siman 15 and 16. The Chayei Adam wrote that if one ate a kezayis in multiple mekomos, as long as it is consumed within a k’dei achilas pras, they combine to require a bracha achrona. It Is important to point out that the Chayei Adam does not
We are starting siman 16 and 17. We will return to discuss situations where it is muttar lechatchilla to move to another place later. First, we will further discuss some halachos regarding bracha achrona. We have learned that a shinui makom does not affect the k’vius created by bread or any of the shivas haminim.