This website is dedicated L’ilui Nishmas R’ Shmuel Yitzchak ben R’ Moshe A”H ר’ שמואל יצחק בן ר’ משה ע”ה
For Halachik questions please contact Rabbi Reingold at q@dvarhalacha.com

Rephael Cattan

1347 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 16) – Conflict Between Kibud Av and Kibud Eim 1

 We are beginning siman 16, which discusses conflict between kibud av and kibud eim. Generally, we consider kibud av and kibud eim as equal, as the Torah equates them. Regarding kibud, it says kabeid es avicha v’es imecha, and regarding yirah, it says ish imo v’aviv tira’u. Chazal explain that the mother is written first […]

1347 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 16) – Conflict Between Kibud Av and Kibud Eim 1 Read More »

1346 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 15) – Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 7 – Parents’ Directive to Children 3

 We are continuing in siman 15, discussing indirect conflicts between kibud av v’eim and other mitzvos. The Chayei Adam discusses a new case: one’s mother asks a child to do something, and their father subsequently comes in and asks the child who told them to do what they are doing. The child realizes that if

1346 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 15) – Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 7 – Parents’ Directive to Children 3 Read More »

1345 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 15) – Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 6 – Parents’ Directive to Children 2

 We are continuing in siman 15. We learned that talmud torah and marriage is greater than kibud av v’eim, in the sense that the child does not need to listen to the parent’s directive in those cases if the child feels it will negatively impact their fulfillment of the mitzvah. We will discuss other applications,

1345 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 15) – Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 6 – Parents’ Directive to Children 2 Read More »

1344 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 15) – Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 5 – Parents’ Directive to Children

 We are beginning siman 15, where the Chayei Adam discusses situations in which a parent wishes to give their child direction on how to perform a mitzvah, but the child wishes to perform the mitzvah in a different manner. The Chayei Adam will give some examples. The Chayei Adam begins with the mitzvah of limud

1344 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 15) – Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 5 – Parents’ Directive to Children Read More »

1343 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 13-14) – Direct Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 4

  We are continuing in siman 14. We have learned that if there is a conflict between kibud av v’eim and a mitzvah overes, if the other mitzvah can be fulfilled by others, the child should do whichever mitzvah they began first, due to the concept of oseik b’mitzvah patur min hamitzvah. If one has

1343 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 13-14) – Direct Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 4 Read More »

1342 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 13-14) – Direct Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 3

 We have finished siman 13, and have a point to clarify. We learned that a child should ignore a parent who wishes that their child not forgive or not speak to a certain individual. However, if the parent wishes the child not to speak to the individual because they are concerned that the individual is

1342 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 13-14) – Direct Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 3 Read More »

1341 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 13) – Direct Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 2

 We are continuing in siman 13, where the Chayei Adam discusses direct conflict between kibud av v’eim and a mitzvah. We learned that if a parent asks a child to transgress even a mitzvah derabanan, the mitzvah derabanan overrides the mitzvah of kibud av v’eim. This halacha is not sourced in any Gemara, but is

1341 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 13) – Direct Conflict Between Kibud and MItzvos 2 Read More »

1340 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 13) – Direct Conflict Between Kibud Av v’Eim and Other MItzvos

We are beginning siman 13, where the Chayei Adam will discuss direct conflict between kibud av v’eim and a mitzvah. If a parent tells a child to transgress a mitzvah asei or lo saasei of the Torah (i.e., even when the parent wishes the child to transgress a mitzvah passively, such as not to put

1340 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 13) – Direct Conflict Between Kibud Av v’Eim and Other MItzvos Read More »

1339 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 12) – Financial Outlay is from the Parent 4 – Understanding the Underlying Logic; Introduction to siman 13-15

 We are finishing siman 12 and need to clarify the concept of mishel av and mishel ben. Any time we discuss a mitzvah, a person is obligated to spend up to one fifth of their money to do the mitzvah. For example, the mitzvah of tefillin is fulfilled by wearing them. Buying tefillin is only

1339 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 12) – Financial Outlay is from the Parent 4 – Understanding the Underlying Logic; Introduction to siman 13-15 Read More »

1338 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 12) – Financial Outlay is from the Parent 3 – Conflict Between Work and Kibud Av v’Eim

 We are continuing in siman 12, regarding children providing financial support to their parents. We learned that If the child has absolutely no money, he is not chayav to knock on doors in an effort to collect for his parents. However, if the child has enough to support himself but not enough to share with

1338 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 12) – Financial Outlay is from the Parent 3 – Conflict Between Work and Kibud Av v’Eim Read More »

1337 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 12) – Financial Outlay is from the Parent 2 – Supporting the Parent

 We are continuing in siman 12, where the Chayei Adam introduces the concept of forcing a child to financially support their parents. We have learned that the child’s chiyuv does not stem from the mitzvah of kibbud av v’eim, because the chiyuv of kibbud av v’eim only includes acts of service. Rather, the chiyuv to

1337 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 12) – Financial Outlay is from the Parent 2 – Supporting the Parent Read More »

1336 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 12) – Financial Outlay is from the Parent 1 – Kofin on Mitzvos

 We are beginning siman 12. As we mentioned in the previous siman, the Chayei Adam writes that the financial outlay for kibud av v’eim is the responsibility of the parents, and the child’s chiyuvim are only the acts of service. Thus, for example, the child may be chayav to feed their parents, but the expenses

1336 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 12) – Financial Outlay is from the Parent 1 – Kofin on Mitzvos Read More »

1335 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 11) – Parents Causing a Loss to Children 3

 We are continuing in siman 11, where the Chayei Adam is discussing a parent causing a financial loss to a child. We have learned that a child may take steps to prevent the loss from happening, even if it will cause the parents a level of distress, when the child knows that the parents do

1335 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 11) – Parents Causing a Loss to Children 3 Read More »

1334 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 10) – Parents Causing a Loss to Children 2

 We are continuing in siman 11, where the Chayei Adam discusses the extent of the kavod one must have for their parents.   The Chayei Adam continues, and writes that there are actually two opinions regarding how to understand the extent of the chiyuv of kibud av v’eim in respect to parents causing a child a

1334 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 10) – Parents Causing a Loss to Children 2 Read More »

1333 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 10) – Parents Causing a Loss to Children 1

 We are beginning siman 11. The Chayei Adam discusses the level of kavod a child must have towards their parents even when the parents are not acting appropriately.  The Chayei Adam writes that the extent of kibud av v’eim is such that even if one is wearing expensive clothing and sitting as one of the

1333 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 10) – Parents Causing a Loss to Children 1 Read More »

1330 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 8) – Mora Av v’Eim 4 – Calling a Parent by Name

 We are continuing in siman 8, where the Chayei Adam discusses the parameters of morah. We left off discussing calling parents by their first names. The Chayei Adam writes that one may not call their parents by their first names. The issue arises, however, when another person asks a child for their parents’ first names.

1330 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 8) – Mora Av v’Eim 4 – Calling a Parent by Name Read More »

1329 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 8) – Mora Av v’Eim 3 – Ignoring a Parent’s Request

 We are continuing in siman 8, where the Chayei Adam discusses the parameters of morah. Yesterday, we discussed when it is muttar to disagree with a parent in the context of conversation. There is another facet to this question, which regards when a parent asks a child to do something.  In the mitzvah of kibud,

1329 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 8) – Mora Av v’Eim 3 – Ignoring a Parent’s Request Read More »

1328 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 8) – Mora Av v’Eim 2

 We are continuing in siman 8, where the Chayei Adam discusses the parameters of morah.   The Chayei Adam writes that a child should not disagree with a parent’s opinion. For example, when a parent is in a discussion with someone else, the child should not say ‘the other person’s opinion makes more sense’, and certainly

1328 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 8) – Mora Av v’Eim 2 Read More »

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors