We have finished siman 1, and are discussing some points brought in the sefer Nasiach Bechukecha which are not addressed by the Chayei Adam. The final point he raises regards a conflict of two mitzvos in which A is more tadir and B is less tadir. We have learned that tadir supersedes ain ma’avirin, and […]
1378 – Tenaim in Asiyas Hamitzvos – (Klal 68 Siman 1) – Ain Maavirin Al Hamitzvos 9 Read More »
We have finished siman 1, and will discuss some points brought in the sefer Nasiach Bechukecha which are not addressed by the Chayei Adam His first point regards one who transgressed and was ma’avir al hamitzvos. For example, mitzvah A presented itself first, but the person passed over it to perform mitzvah B instead. Should
1377 – Tenaim in Asiyas Hamitzvos – (Klal 68 Siman 1) – Ain Maavirin Al Hamitzvos 8 Read More »
We are continuing in siman 1. We left off discussing the third limitation to ain ma’avirin, namely, if by waiting a day or two, one will be able to perform the mitzvah in a better way, ain ma’avirin potentially will not apply. We learned that the Chayei Adam began by writing that one should wait,
1376 – Tenaim in Asiyas Hamitzvos – (Klal 68 Siman 1) – Ain Maavirin Al Hamitzvos 7 Read More »
We are continuing in siman 1. We are beginning the third limitation to the concept of ain ma’avirin. The Chayei Adam writes that included in the concept of ain ma’avirin is the idea not to delay performing a mitzvah (as we learned from the pasuk of ushmartem es hamatzos, see shiur 1370). This pasuk teaches
1375 – Tenaim in Asiyas Hamitzvos – (Klal 68 Siman 1) – Ain Maavirin Al Hamitzvos 6 Read More »
1We are continuing in siman 1. We are beginning the second limitation to the concept of ain ma’avirin. The Chayei Adam writes that ain ma’avirin only applies to a mitzvah in which one is actively involved. If someone else is involved in the mitzvah, and you are just a spectator, even though your presence increases
1374 – Tenaim in Asiyas Hamitzvos – (Klal 68 Siman 1) – Ain Maavirin Al Hamitzvos 5 Read More »
We are continuing in siman 1, where the Chayei Adam introduces the concept of ain ma’avirin al hamitzvos. We have learned that the Chayei Adam holds that there are three limitations to this concept, in which ain ma’avirin would be superseded. The first limitation is when a person would not have time to perform both
1373 – Tenaim in Asiyas Hamitzvos – (Klal 68 Siman 1) – Ain Maavirin Al Hamitzvos 4 Read More »
We are continuing in siman 1, where the Chayei Adam introduces the concept of ain ma’avirin al hamitzvos. We have learned the Chayei Adam holds that there are three limitations to this concept, in which ain ma’avirin would be superseded. Yesterday, we began learning about the first limitation, when a person would not have time
1372 – Tenaim in Asiyas Hamitzvos – (Klal 68 Siman 1) – Ain Maavirin Al Hamitzvos 3 Read More »
We are continuing in siman 1, where the Chayei Adam introduces the concept of ain ma’avirin al hamitzvos. The concept of ain maavirin only applies when there are two mitzvos in question, where the proper way to perform them is the order in which they interface with the person, as we have learned regarding tallis
1371 – Tenaim in Asiyas Hamitzvos – (Klal 68 Siman 1) – Ain Maavirin Al Hamitzvos 2 Read More »
We are beginning siman 1. The Chayei Adam writes that one should not be maavir al hamitzvos, meaning, that if one is presented with the opportunity to perform two mitzvos, and comes upon one of them first, he is not allowed to ignore that mitzvah in order to perform the other. One may not leave
1370 – Tenaim in Asiyas Hamitzvos – (Klal 68 Siman 1) – Ain Maavirin Al Hamitzvos Read More »
We are beginning Klal 68. Klal 68 is a wide-ranging Klal, in which the Chayei Adam discusses various halachic concepts regarding the proper way to perform mitzvos. The idea behind this Klal possibly came from the Sefer Chareidim, a sefer written by one of the Gedolim who lived in Tzfas at the same time as
1369 – Tenaim in Asiyas Hamitzvos – (Klal 68 Siman 1) – Introduction Read More »
We have been learning from Sefer Chassidim for the past few days, and I would like to share a biographical sketch of its author and background to the sefer. The author of the Sefer is Rav Yehuda Chasid, son of Rav Shmuel Chasid. Rav Shmuel Chasid is best known as the author of the Shir
We have finished siman 30. The Chayei Adam ends the siman by referring the learner to oisiyos in Sefer Chassidim, where the Sefer Chassidim discusses kibud av v’eim. In os 568, the Sefer Chassidim writes that if a parent gives a child a list of responsibilities, the task which is most important to the parent
We have finished siman 30. The Chayei Adam ends the siman by referring the learner to oisiyos in Sefer Chassidim, where the Sefer Chassidim discusses kibud av v’eim. In the middle of os 564, the Sefer Chassidim writes that if a married man’s parents are argumentative people, and are getting into arguments with his wife
We have finished siman 30. The Chayei Adam ends the siman by referring the learner to oisiyos in Sefer Chassidim, where the Sefer Chassidim discusses kibud av v’eim. In os 343, the Sefer Chassidim quotes the pasuk from tehillim, hinei mah tov umah na’im, sheves achim gam yachad, how good and pleasant it is when
We have finished siman 30. The Chayei Adam ends the siman by referring the learner to oisiyos in Sefer Chassidim, where the Sefer Chassidim discusses kibud av v’eim. In os 338, the Sefer Chassidim discusses a case where a father wishes their son should learn Torah and the father will work in the son’s stead.
We have finished siman 30, and have a few other points to discuss. The Chayei Adam quoted the Tanna D’vei Eliyahu regarding the proximity of the mitzvah of kibud av v’eim to lo sinaf and lo signov. We will learn other ideas written by the Tanna D’vei Eliyahu regarding kibud av v’eim. In Perek 26
1363 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 30) – Divrei Agada about Kibud Av v’Eim 2 Read More »
We are beginning siman 30, in which the Chayei Adam does not discuss any halacha per se, but different drashos of Chazal regarding the mitzvah of kibud av v’eim. The Chayei Adam writes that the Tanna D’vei Eliyahu, which contains lessons taught by Eliyahu Hanavi, points out that the Torah teaches us the mitzvos of
1362 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 30) – Divrei Agada about Kibud Av v’Eim – 1 Read More »
We are continuing in siman 29, where the Chayei Adam discusses a child causing possible or definite bleeding to their parents. The Chayei Adam gives the examples of removing a splinter (which may cause possible bleeding) or an amputation (which will certainly cause bleeding). To clarify, this halacha is a machlokes Shulchan Aruch and Rema.
1361 – Kibud Av v’Eim – (Klal 67 Siman 28-29) – Hitting a Parent 2 Read More »
We are beginning siman 28, which discusses a child striking a parent. If a child strikes a parent in a manner which causes them to bleed, they are chayav misah through chenek (choking). If the blow does not cause an open wound, they transgress a lav, and are chayav malkus in the same way they
We are continuing in siman 26. We learned that if parents wish to serve a child, they may, because retzono shel adam zeh kevodo. However, we learned that the opinion of the Pri Chodosh is that a child may never accept service from a father who is a talmid chochom, even if the father has
